Canadian capitalism booming as conservative PM roars to victory
By Grace Vuoto
The Canadian economy is outperforming that of the world’s superpower. The Canadian dollar is stronger than America’s—and its 3.3 percent annual growth last year makes America’s 2.9 percent growth look miserable by comparison. In 2011, the Canadian economy is growing faster than any other G-7 nation.
As a result of its small-government, pro-business polices, the Canadian Conservative government roared to victory on Monday, signaling an endorsement of Prime Minister Stephen Harper’s masterful stewardship. Since when is it appropriate to say “Canada” and “capitalism” in the same sentence?
It used to be that American conservatives would regularly mock our neighbors to the north as “socialists” — “The Socialist Republic of Canuckistan,” they would sneer. That was back in the day when America espoused limited government and Canadians elected leaders to enlarge the state. Yet, since the later years of the Bush administration, Americans are interventionist and Canadians allow the free market to propel the economy to great heights. And the results are unmistakable: The Canadian economy is thriving while the American one barely has a pulse.
Also In This Edition
At the heart of this minor miracle is one man: Mr. Harper. He rescued an embattled Conservative Party from near extinction, and rode the tumultuous waves of two minority governments since 2006 — one of which recently collapsed on a non-confidence vote in Parliament. And at last, his policies of fiscal conservatism were vindicated at the polls: The Conservatives have the first non-Liberal majority government in 23 years, with a stunning 167 seats out of 308.
Now, the next four years in Canada look as bright as the Florida sunshine. Mr. Harper has a mandate to cut spending. He promises to balance the budget — tame problems by current U.S. standards — by 2014. And he has vowed to lower personal income tax rates.
Liberal party supporters watch the results at the election night headquarters of Canada's Liberal leader Michael Ignatieff in Toronto, May 2. Reuters/Adrien Veczan
Canadians have weathered the recent “Great Recession” in the U.S. in a manner that is simply astounding. Usually, when the American economy falters, the Canadian one quickly thereafter suffers the same woes, as Canada is America’s largest trading partner. Yet, not this time. The Canadian banking and mortgage industry did not fall into the same traps as its American counterparts. As a result, the Canadian housing market remained steady, even throughout the worst crisis in America. Ironically, the Wall Street Journal’s Mary Anastasia O’Grady interviewed Canadian Finance Minister Jim Flaherty in a June 26 article titled, “Canada: Land of the Free.” She probed how Canada “avoided the mistakes that led to the housing and banking crash in the U.S.” Since when did Canadians become models for Americans?
And guess who is benefiting from the U.S. housing meltdown? Canadians! They are buying homes in record numbers in Arizona. There has been a million-dollar luxury home sold to a Canadian buyer every week for nearly two years, said the Arizona Business Council at the end of April. In order to escape harsh winters, Canadian “snowbirds” usually vacation in America’s warm and sunny climates. Now, having held on to one home easily in the Great North, they have swooped in to buy vacation homes — or perhaps a better home than their primary residence — in the American South. More than 600,000 Canadians are flocking into Arizona, a state where they are the dominant foreign investors.
Thus, when Canadians kick up their feet for a rest, they will be doing so for years to come on foreign soil, in their very own backyards in Arizona and also in Florida — riding merrily on the backs of all those Americans who overstretched and overreached, bit off more than they could chew and foreclosed their homes, causing values to plummet and homes to fall right into the hands of their neighbors to the North. And with strong Canadian dollars in their pocket — these happy foreigners can buy lots of American electronics, attend the finest U.S. restaurants and even bring home the champagne while they are here a few weeks of the year. While Americans suffer, the good times roll for the merry Canucks.
Americans will soon have to explain to their children that long ago Canadians had an inferiority complex to the world’s superpower along their border. Among many reasons for this was that Americans had such tremendous purchasing power: Americans would raid Canadian stores, lapping so many goods onto their shopping carts it would leave even the check-out clerks gasping with envy.
Now, thanks to Mr. Harper’s policies, Canada’s general sales tax has been slashed — 5 percent rather than 7 percent — and Canadians therefore have more money in their pockets. At the same time, Canadian loonies (a dollar coin) with the radiant face of Queen Elizabeth II can be exchanged for an even larger number of U.S. dollars with George Washington on them, and these can be spent anywhere — including on cheap Chinese goods available in U.S.stores.
There was a time when Canadians talked incessantly about the Canadian brain drain: “Why do all our talented professionals flock to the U.S.? How can we stop this?” they would ask. And no matter how many times this was discussed, there were no good answers — no way to compete with the gargantuan U.S. economy. Now, the giant sucking sound can be heard in reverse: With a federal corporate tax rate that will fall to 15 percent in 2012, Canada is saying we are open for business; come this way for investments, come this way for future jobs.
And also dramatic, many Canadians are giving up on the much-vaunted concept of universal public health care. Many are fed up with long lines for routine visits to a doctor and tired of hearing stories about hard-working, tax-paying citizens dying before they get urgent operations. Hence, waves of private alternatives have sprung up to compete with an overburdened, inefficient public health care system. Even Canada’s pride and glory — nationalized health care — is gradually adopting the principles of competition and privatization.
But don’t tell any of this to President Barack Obama. He lives in a golden halo: that of 1970s Canada. Then, in Canada, from the late-1960s until the mid-1980s, there was a flamboyant leader — an intellectual — promising so much that would be new and fabulous. There was a public “mania” for him too. It was called “Trudeaumania” and in many respects it resembled the Obamamania of 2008. Late Prime Minister Pierre Elliott Trudeau brought socialism to Canada which resulted in grinding down the Canadian economy for decades — especially since his policies were adopted by his Liberal successors who would subsequently dominate federal politics. That is, until Canadians realized they could never keep up with their American neighbors who were doing so much better.
It was tough, but Canadians finally grew up: They discovered it is better after all to balance budgets, cut deficits and make the economy business-friendly. They realized competition and capitalism actually helps more Canadians become richer than government handouts. A revolution occurred, without a shot being fired: The Canadian Iron Curtain came tumbling down, allowing for an era of greater economic freedom. Welcome to the new Canada: Looks a lot like the old U.S.A. And the new U.S.A looks a lot like the old Canada.
Canadians are riding high. There are so many “c”-letter words that bring them joy: Les Canadiens, Les Conservatives and Les Capitalistes. It all has a really nice ring to it.
Dr. Grace Vuoto is the Executive Director of the Edmund Burke Institute for American Renewal.
Thanks for your letter. After initial cuts in education and health care during the mid-1990s, the federal Liberals went on a massive spending binge. They became implicated in numerous corruption scandals, where billions in taxpayer dollars were used as secret political slush funds. Canadians have now spoken: They have rewarded the Conservatives with a majority and rendered the Liberals little more than a rump party. Had the Liberals been as masterful stewards of the economy as you claim, it is unlikely Canadians would have rejected them wholesale and allowed the Conservatives to reemerge as a major force. Evidently, Canadians recognize that Mr. Harper's fiscal conservatism is better for the economy than big-government Liberalism.
Moreover, the problem with the U.S. banking system had nothing to do with so-called "deregulation." In fact, it was excessive government regulation and state meddling in the banking sector--through vast government sponsored enterprises (GSEs) such as Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac--that encouraged irresponsible borrowing and lending practices. The goal was to foster higher rates of home ownership among the "less privileged." Instead, this triggered the disastrous housing bubble. By contrast, Canadian banking standards were maintained by the Tories under Mr. Harper dating back to 2006--years before the U.S. financial collapse. So, yes, the Conservatives do deserve some credit for Canada's sound banking system.
Finally, Canada's single-payer health system is crumbling. Like all government-run command-and-control systems, it has led to massive rationing and long lines. Four to five million Canadians admit to not being able to find a family physician. Referrals to see specialists — especially, those dealing with cancer — can take up to six months. This is why numerous provinces — not just Quebec, but Saskatchewan (the home of socialized medicine), and Alberta — are experimenting with private clinics. I have had numerous family members undergo cancer treatments in Canada. I wish it upon no one. My mother-in-law, for example, battled pancreatic cancer for nearly 5 years. She endured long waits — sometimes months — to see her specialist. The doctors encouraged her to go to the U.S. for quicker, better treatment because of the rampant deficiencies in the Canadian system. At the end, she was even denied access to a hospital room because of over-capacity. She went home, and passed out in her own vomit. This is one of numerous examples I and many Canadians can provide. This medical system does not provide dignity, compassion or "social justice." Canadians can — and will — do better than accepting such failures. That is why the true compassion is to allow private alternatives to emerge.
And finally, I am neither a Republican nor a libertarian. I am a traditional conservative. And by the way, I was born and raised in Canada, have worked many years in the U.S.A., and know both societies quite well — not just based on my reading of current events but through intimate, daily experience with both systems of government. Sadly, under Mr. Obama, the U.S.A is adopting some of Canada's worst features. Yet, remarkably, under Mr. Harper, Canada is adopting the best features of the pre-Obama U.S.A. And the proof as to what is working best is in the numbers: the U.S. economy is mired in difficulty and the Canadian one is soaring.
3:46 p.m. / Friday, May 13, 2011
I applaud Harper's victory in the recent election. He has been a good fiscal manager. His success follows the extraordinary job former Finance Minister, Paul Martin did bringing Canada's fiscal house under control. Please see the article in the May 9, 2011 edition of INVESTOR'S BUSINESS DAILY written by Jed Graham titled, "Paul Martin, Canada's Budget Boulder", for a more complete look at Canada's budgetary success. To credit Stephen Harper without acknowledging Martin's role is disingenuous. Canada's relative fiscal success today is a result of 16 years of tough decisions supported by Canadians under the leadership of Jean Chretien, Paul Martin and Stephen Harper. Further, Brian Mulroney's leadership in implementing NAFTA was also critical to Canada's current financial success. Canadian's made the hard choices over the last 35 years. It may take the U.S. just as long to return to a sound fiscal future.
10:57 p.m. / Thursday, May 12, 2011
Sorry to rain on the parade here folks but the buoyancy of today's Canadian economy was due more to a very long slog of fiscal discipline imposed upon the country back in the early 1990's by a LIBERAL administration. That gov't also refused to let Canadian banks merge & expand into the US in the late 1990's, thus avoiding the meltdown of the unregulated US financial markets that took place over the latter half of this past decade. Also Canada's health care system is a long way from falling apart. It takes me about 2 wks to see my GP upon booking an appointment. And yes, "socialist" Quebec has experimented with private clinics. But this is due more to that province's desperate financial state of affairs rather than the alleged superiority of a private payer system. (and that has occurred due to successive Quebec provincial gov'ts concentrating on 2 referendums to separate from the rest of the country instead of running a tight fiscal ship). A recent poll found about 96% of Canadians would favour keeping our current health care system ( even with it many flaws) rather than trading it in for the supposed splendours of the current US system. Grace Vuoto should know better than to spout all that Republican/Libertarian ideological bilge water.
1:36 a.m. / Thursday, May 12, 2011
I LOVE the expression on those two libs' faces as the election results come in... PRICELESS!
3:52 a.m. / Tuesday, May 10, 2011
It would involve moving too far away from my grandchildren; otherwise, I think my wife and I would be well advised to seek residency in our neighboring country. It has much more than its economy going for it.
9:10 a.m. / Monday, May 9, 2011
I'm sure Canada has its lefty socialist politicians too but none in recent times like Barney Frank and Chuck Todd, backed by the Soros Democrat Party, who helped bring down the mortgage-banking system, crash real estate, tank the dollar and negatively impact the rest of the economy. Whay to go, eh!?