{"id":132139,"date":"2024-02-13T14:10:27","date_gmt":"2024-02-13T19:10:27","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.worldtribune.com\/?p=132139"},"modified":"2024-02-13T14:10:27","modified_gmt":"2024-02-13T19:10:27","slug":"vaccine-tyrants-blame-religious-extremism-in-shift-from-bullying-to-emotional-manipulation","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/worldtribune.com\/2025\/vaccine-tyrants-blame-religious-extremism-in-shift-from-bullying-to-emotional-manipulation\/","title":{"rendered":"Vaccine tyrants blame ‘religious extremism’ in shift from bullying to emotional manipulation"},"content":{"rendered":"

Special to WorldTribune.com<\/span>, February 13, 2024<\/em><\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

Corporate<\/span> WATCH<\/span><\/span><\/h1>\n

Commentary by<\/em><\/span> Joe Schaeffer <\/span><\/strong><\/span><\/a>@Schaeff55<\/a><\/p>\n

The Jan. 27 op-ed, platformed at big-box heavyweight The New York Times, did not appear out of thin air:<\/p>\n

The response has been almost like clockwork, at nearly every medical visit in the past few weeks. \u201cIt\u2019s time for the flu shot,\u201d I\u2019ll say to my patients, \u201cplus the updated Covid vaccine.\u201d And that\u2019s when the groans start.<\/em><\/p>\n

\u201cMy Patients Used to Be Gung-Ho About the Covid Vaccine. What Changed?\u201d reads the disingenuous headline to the piece<\/a> penned by Danielle Ofri, \u201ca primary care doctor in New York,\u201d as if there is some mystery<\/a> involved. The \u201csafe and effective\u201d narrative<\/a> forced down Americans\u2019 throats during the heyday of the tyrannical coronavirus social regime has completely crumbled. Coercion won\u2019t work anymore. What\u2019s the next move?<\/p>\n

\"\"Establishment physicians are now being tasked with the difficult chore of normalizing an experimental gene therapy falsely described as a \u201cvaccine\u201d as a routine and regular part of patient health care. This comes in the face of increasing reports<\/a> that add to the already voluminous pile of data proving how lethally dangerous the jabs are:<\/p>\n

When they say, \u201cI\u2019ve had enough Covid vaccinations already,\u201d I\u2019ll probe where the sense of \u201cenough\u201d comes from. I might ask, \u201cDo you ever feel this way about your diabetes medicines or your mammograms?\u201d <\/strong>We\u2019ll explore how they come to conclusions about which treatments they accept and try to separate vague discomfort from specific concerns.<\/em><\/p>\n

Despite a stated desire to achieve dialogue with her patients, Dr. Ofri\u2019s entire tone is unmistakably patronizing:<\/p>\n

A review of the facts is less about starting a lecture and more about examining emotional responses. <\/strong>We talk openly about what they are hearing in their communities \u2014 that the pandemic is over, that the new boosters are more experimental than the old ones, that some number of vaccinations is too many.<\/em><\/p>\n

It can be a revelation to some patients<\/em><\/strong> when they realize that they may be reacting to<\/strong> a sense of the waters being muddied rather than specific information or misinformation.<\/em><\/p>\n

The primary care doctor still serves as a front-line soldier in Big Pharma\u2019s emotional manipulation war, but far larger efforts are underway as well.<\/p>\n

How\u2019s this for a nice scare campaign? \u201cFDA leaders say thousands of Americans are likely to die this winter because too many of them no longer believe in vaccines,\u201d screams the headline to a January 2024 article<\/a> published by the Journal of the American Medical Association.<\/p>\n

This came out the same month as Ofri\u2019s well-publicized New York Times opinion piece. It\u2019s all coordinated, none of this is unique individual perspective.<\/p>\n

The two FDA authors point out what they see as a dire reason promoting this sad trend, which they are literally describing as deadly:<\/p>\n

Despite the care taken in the development and deployment of vaccines and their clear and compelling benefit of saving individual lives and improving population health outcomes, an increasing number of people in the U.S. are now declining vaccination for<\/strong> a variety of reasons, ranging from safety concerns to religious beliefs.<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n

Setting aside for now the controversial issue of vaccine mandates at the federal, state, or local level in the U.S., which are not within the purview of the Food and Drug Administration, the situation has now deteriorated to the point that population immunity against some vaccine-preventable infectious diseases is at risk<\/strong>, and thousands of excess deaths<\/strong> are likely to occur this season due to illnesses amenable to prevention or reduction in severity of illness with vaccines. <\/em><\/p>\n

The disgusting message being sent by top FDA officials Dr. Peter Marks and Dr. Robert Califf: Your religious beliefs are killing people.<\/p>\n

They\u2019re hardly the only ones pursuing this grotesque tack.<\/p>\n

An organization called the Vaccine Confidence Project\u2019s mission statement is clear from the name. The group is funded by<\/a>… well you know already… but the World Economic Forum and YouTube are some interesting names listed alongside the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, Merck and Meta (Facebook).<\/p>\n

It is of exceedingly great interest to note that this globalist organization sees religious belief as a main impediment to its goal. An ominously titled \u201cTheory of Change\u201d section on the Vaccine Confidence Project\u2019s website contains a diagram labeled<\/a> \u201cPillars of Vaccine Confidence.\u201d It contains a circle of factors that lead to more trust in vaccines. Included are \u201csafety,\u201d \u201cimportance\u201d and \u201ceffectiveness.\u201d<\/p>\n

It is impossible not to notice that one item stands heads and shoulders above all these.<\/p>\n

At the top of the circle is \u201cReligious compatibility.\u201d A small illustration accompanying it features symbols of the world\u2019s great religions.<\/p>\n

Direct attacks on religious belief, of course, was a staple of the coercive vaccine regime during the height of the pandemic hysteria.<\/p>\n

Professor Heidi J. Larson of The London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine is founder and director<\/a> of The Vaccine Confidence Project. At an October 2021 event hosted by Boston University, School of Public Health, Larson spelled things out:<\/p>\n

\n

Larson shares some of the determinants of vaccine hesitancy. <\/p>\n

"This is not just about the vaccine, this is about the system. This is about religion. This is about politics," @ProfHeidiLarson<\/a> says. #SPHConversations<\/a> #vaccines<\/a> pic.twitter.com\/e9uTWVwVgb<\/a><\/p>\n

— Boston University School of Public Health (@BUSPH) October 4, 2021<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n