by WorldTribune Staff, July 26, 2026 Non-AI Real World News

Senior National Institutes of Health (NIH) leaders, including Francis Collins and Anthony Fauci, sought to downplay 2021 reports on neurological injuries from the Covid injections to avoid public hesitancy in taking the shots according to newly released emails.

The correspondence reveals internal discussions aimed at managing data regarding potentially millions of post-jab adverse events.

Dr. Avindra Nath, a senior investigator with the NIH’s National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, was studying people in 2020 and 2021 with neurological problems after having taken the shot the Epoch Times reported on Friday.

In an email on April 10, 2021, Nath sent a draft of a paper to the institute’s director, Walter Koroshetz, that outlined what he had found:

“Early recognition and treatment with corticosteroids can reverse the symptoms.”

The following day, the institute’s director sent the manuscript to Fauci, who at the time was director of another NIH institute.

“There have been steady slow stream of reports to me of post vaccination neurologic conditions, seem to be mostly peripheral nerve disorders … maybe an occasional spinal cord issue,” Koroshetz told Fauci. “Avi has been collecting a bunch. He has a report sent out to publish. Hard to know not due to chance but are timed to the vaccination.”

Another NIH employee sent the manuscript to Collins, who was NIH director at the time, and Lawrence Tabak, a second top NIH official, and shared that the New England Journal of Medicine rejected the paper.

“What do you make of this?” Collins wrote in response. “The draft letter doesn’t explain how these 32 patients were referred — leaving one to wonder whether this is common or rare.”

Koroshetz told Collins that many reports had been lodged with the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) and that Nath had been attracting referrals because he had appeared on a podcast to discuss neurological problems affecting individuals after they had received the Covid injection.

Koroshetz also said that Nath, and another employee at his institute, had suffered tinnitus after receiving the shot, and that Nath had hearing loss.

Collins said the approach taken by Nath’s team was “very troubling,” adding, “collecting anecdotes and then trying to build a case isn’t scientifically compelling — and will have the main consequence of feeding vaccine hesitancy and social media overreaction.”

Tabak wrote privately to Collins, telling him: “I don’t understand why Walter does not shut this down.”

“While the emails do not prove that Collins, Tabak, or Fauci expressly ordered Nath to abandon the manuscript, they raise serious questions about whether NIH leadership viewed its potential effect on vaccine confidence as a compelling reason to suppress its publication,” the Informed Consent Action Network (ICAN), which released the missives on July 22, said in a statement.

Collins, Fauci, and Nath did not return requests for comment by the time of publication. Tabak could not be reached.

The paper was never published in a journal. It was released as a preprint, or without peer review, in May 2022, more than one year after Nath sent it to Koroshetz.

Danice Hertz, a retired gastroenterologist who received the Pfizer-BioNTech shot shortly after it was authorized in 2020 and suffered severe problems, was one of the patients who was examined by Nath’s team.

“I have always believed that Fauci must have told Nath to stop talking to us, as we were all abruptly dismissed from Nath’s care without explanation. Now I know that my suspicions were true,” Hertz told The Epoch Times in an email after reading the newly released missives.

250 Years of Freedom Is At Risk

  Emails: Collins feared research on vaccine injuries could feed ‘hesitancy’ and ‘overreaction’, WorldTribune.com